Definition: And the righteous men, they shall judge them after the manner of adulteresses, and after the manner of women that shed blood; because they [are] adulteresses, and blood [is] in their hands.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezekiel 23:45. It’s a pretty serious statement about justice and righteousness. Here's a simplified explanation: The Core Idea: This verse is condemning those who engage in sexual immorality – specifically, adultery and violence – as being deeply wrong and morally corrupt. Let's unpack it word by word: “And the righteous men, they shall judge them after the manner of adulteresses…” - This refers to men who are living a life of sin, perhaps in sexual relationships that are outside of marriage or violating social norms. "Judge them" means to hold them accountable for their actions. “…and after the manner of women that shed blood;” – This is where it gets more intense. “Shedding blood” refers to violence, murder, and any act of harm or aggression. It’s a strong metaphor for taking life or causing pain. “because they [are] adulteresses, and blood [is] in their hands.” - This is the crucial part. "Adulterers" are those who violate marriage vows; they are breaking trust and engaging in immoral behavior. "Blood in their hands" means they are using violence or harming others as a result of their actions – it’s a clear indication of malice and wrongdoing. Overall Meaning & Context: Ezekiel 23:45 is essentially saying that those who act with such moral flaws – particularly through sexual misconduct and violence – will be held to a standard of justice similar to those who commit these harmful acts themselves. It's a warning about the consequences of wickedness and a call for righteous living. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted as a condemnation of societal corruption, but it’s also seen as a reminder of humanity’s responsibility to uphold moral standards. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Give you a related story or example? Discuss the historical context of this passage?